However, it is only a coincidence that the big hockey event started on the Victory Day.
In Belarus, more than 20 youth political and social activists were put into prison until the end of the Ice Hockey World Championship, which has opened in Minsk on May 9. The hunt on activists in Minsk and in the regions is going on.
The head of the Swedish human rights organization Östgruppen Martin Uggla, who wasn’t let into Belarus on May 7, has been deported from the country.
Belarusan authorities are making a clean-up operation of the inner-political field in order to get rid of “undesirable” people, who might attract attention to the huge problems in the country.
For two weeks the authorities want to listen to fans in Belarus, not citizens. Why is it so? And is it a mere coincidence that the Ice Hockey World Championship was opened on Victory Day? Why can’t the hockey be a holiday for all Belarusans? Ulad Vialichka, the head of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, answered the questions of the “EuroBelarus” Information Service.
- On the threshold of the Ice Hockey World Championship in Minsk a number of Belarusan and international public organizations, including the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, in their statement called for the official Minsk to play fair, i.e. , to observe human rights. Was someone still hoping that hockey will humanize our authorities?
- There is no doubt that hockey can’t humanize Belarusan authorities on its own. The only fact of having the huge sports event is very important for an average Belarusan. We, the authors of the statement, didn’t counted that our call will liberalize the regime or make it respect universal values.
We use this large-scale cause to attract attention of Belarus’ guests, tourists, sport fans of Belarus and the whole world to the things that are not apparent to the naked eye. Of course, we, in Belarus, have a lot of good things, but we also have a lot of problems and flaws, including violations of human rights and disrespect of civil values.
- Swedish human rights fighter Martin Uggla went in Belarus with a hockey ticket; however, Belarusan authorities detained him in Minsk-2 airport only to deport him later. Will this Belarusan hospitality affect the atmosphere of the Hockey Championship?
- I think it won’t affect the atmosphere of the championship this much. Human rights in Belarus were never prioritized; the story which happened to Martin Uggla proves that the authorities are not going to learn a lesson and change the situation with human rights, as it is easier to throw people out of country than to try to resolve the problems. By the example of Martin Uggla, the authorities demonstrated that not all the words and actions of the Belarusan authorities are true, as despite the proclaimed visa-free regime, it is not working for undesirable people.
- How did it happen that Martin Uggla got into a black list?
- From the moment of the foundation of the Swedish human rights organization Östgruppen, which cooperates with the human rights centre “Viasna” and Legal Transformation Center “Lawtrend”, Martin started having problems with the Belarusan authorities, and he might as well have been expecting problems this time. Obviously, he was trying to check whether the promises about the visa-free regime given by the authorities work for the foreigners. Thanks to Martin, the myth about Belarus opening up for the world during IHWC-2014 has been shattered.
- Why did the world community decide to hold a world ice hockey championship in the “last dictatorship in Europe”? Couldn’t it find some more appropriate and civilized country?
- Well, I’m proud of the fact that Belarus is capable of hosting such large-scale sporting events. Nevertheless, unfortunately, I understand that the Belarusan regime is using this event in order to speculate in the public opinion, get undeserved political dividend and demonstrate pseudo-successfulness.
The decision to hold the Ice Hockey World Championship in Minsk was made, first of all, for reasons of sport; unfortunately, political situation cannot serve as an extra-point for making a decision.
Before the championship, the international civil community called for depriving the Belarusan regime of the right to hold the championship. However, by way of Russia’s example, we see that huge sporting events are run not only in democratic countries.
Political regimes of many countries aren’t flawless; but should we consider cancelling a sporting or cultural event each time, and by this punish the citizens of these countries together with the regime? In my opinion, each country should be treated individually.
Hockey championship is a good reason to pay heed to the social, political problems of the country. The chain of preventive detentions during the last week proves that the authorities are afraid of any demonstrations, incidents and citizens’ activity. For two weeks the authorities want to listen to fans in Belarus, not citizens.
- Ice Hockey World Championship was opened on May 9, on Victory Day. Is it a mere coincidence or there is some special meaning that is put in it?
- As a fan I can say that world championships usually start either at the end of April or in the beginning of May. It is dictated by the calendar, the Olympics in Sochi in particular, which moved the sporting calendar. I would call it a controlled coincidence, but certainly, there is no conspiracy in it. May 9 remains the day of victory over fascism; and at the same time, it is a nice day to start a huge sporting event.
I hope that there will be much fewer negative incidents (as the one which happened with Martin Uggla) than the positive ones.
The Belarus Committee of ICOMOS announces the collection of cases on the effectiveness of the State List of Historical and Cultural Values as a tool of the safeguarding the cultural monuments.
On March 27-28, the Belarus ICOMOS and the EuroBelarus held an online expert workshop on expanding opportunities for community participation in the governance of historical and cultural heritage.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.
"Specificity is different, but the priority is general." In Valożyn, a local strategy for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
The campaign "Agenda 50" was summed up in Ščučyn, and a local action plan for the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed there.
The regional center has become the second city in Belarus where the local plan for the implementation of the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was signed.
Representatives of the campaign “Agenda 50” from five pilot cities discussed achievements in creating local agendas for implementing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
It is noteworthy that out of the five pilot cities, Stoubcy was the last to join the campaign “Agenda 50”, but the first one to complete the preparation of the local agenda.
On May 28, the city hosted a presentation of the results of the project "Equal to Equal" which was dedicated to monitoring the barrier-free environment in the city.
On March 3, members of the campaign "Agenda 50" from different Belarusian cities met in Minsk. The campaign is aimed at the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
In Stolin, social organizations and local authorities are implementing a project aimed at independent living of persons with disabilities, and creating local agenda for the district.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.