Friday 22 November 2024 | 20:16

Uladzimir Matskevich: Putin is driven into the corner

23.07.2014  |  Politics   |  Aliaksei Jurych, EuroBelarus,  
Uladzimir Matskevich: Putin is driven into the corner

The Boeing-777 catastrophe can speed up the end of the anti-terror operation, but only in case Russian authorities drop the idea of invasion into Ukraine and declaring a war against the whole world.

Putin is offering excuses for the circumstances in which Russian gunmen destroyed Malaysian Boeing-777 in the Ukrainian sky with passengers onboard. International community, which looked upon the Russia-Ukraine war as upon a local conflict, now perceives the deaths of their citizens as a threat that Russia poses to the whole world.

Uladzimir Matskevich, the head of the Board of the International Consortium “EuroBelarus”, told EuroBelarus Information Serviceabout the destruction of the Boeing-777 and its consequences for Ukraine, Russia and the whole world.

- Why did destruction of the Malaysian Boeing-777 transform a local Russia-Ukraine military conflict into a mondial problem?

-There is a clear answer why: first of all, the airliner which has no connection to the conflict whatsoever is destroyed; almost three hundred people died, and most of them are EU citizens. Thus, basically all international norms and agreements have been disrupted.

The destruction of Boeing-777 is a bandit terroristic action that was executed by mistake and inadvertently.

- But during the armed confrontation in Ukraine thousands have already died: Ukrainian soldiers, Russian gunmen, and – what is more frightening – civilians. Comparing with these figures, the death of 300 more people is, however cynical it may sound, a drop in the ocean. The world leaders appealed to Putin’s conscience, introduced sanctions against Russia, but did it with restraint. What has changed?

- The war launched by Russia in Ukraine, can be viewed as a local armed confrontation. Officially, despite all the proofs of preparations, funding and supplies of weaponry to the gunmen, Russia denied its participation in the military conflict at the east of Ukraine, and the West had to take the official Kremlin position into account.

The international community looked upon Russia-Ukraine conflict as upon a local one, no matter how many victims it caused; it was only Russian propaganda that pictured it as Russia’s confrontation against the whole world.

The position of the West didn’t change until the terrorists shot down the airliner Boeing-777. It gave the US possibility to promulgate the data collected by American secret services from other sources, and all the collected data gave the leaders of the world countries a possibility to make explicit statements.

The catastrophe itself served as a reason to bring all the facts about Russia’s participation in the armed confrontation with Ukraine to the public, even though impartial observers and analysts have already known all about preparation of gunmen, funding and weapon.

- Due to the destruction of Boeing-777 Putin made a special video-statement at night. But in this statement Russian president made Ukraine responsible for the ruination of the airliner, saying that if Ukraine didn’t renew an anti-terror operation, nothing bad would have happened. What Putin statement is about then?

- His statement has no sense; it is a mere attempt to save his face and be justified. It is no coincidence that the statement was issued after the phone talks with the leaders of the G8 countries.

Though Putin doesn’t deny the fact of Russia’s participation in the destruction of the airliner, he tries to put all the blame for it on the anti-terror operation renewed by Ukraine.

Nevertheless, Putin is lying, as the anti-terror operation organized by the Ukrainian authorities in Donetsk and Lugansk regions is reasonable and justifiable as a response to the dreadful bandit invasion of Russian gunmen who got a command from Kremlin; any European state wouldn’t leave such aggression unattended.

Putin is driven into the corner, so he has nothing to do but to justify himself. Putin doesn’t have any chances to retreat, and that what G8 pointed him out during the phone call.

- The catastrophe of Boeing-777 put an end to the hybrid war, assumes Ukrainian journalist Vitaly Portnikov. Putin is facing a hard choice: either to stop a military invasion into Ukraine or to announce a full-scale war. Does Kremlin have a third variant?

- I can only agree with it partially. On a large scale, the catastrophe saved the gunmen from their total annihilation. Now, when Russia and Putin have to stop supplying Russian gunmen with weaponry, the anti-terror operation will soon end, and its results are obvious. The gunmen will surrender only to be captured and fall under the jurisdiction of Ukraine, not Russia. And here Kremlin has only two options. As Kremlin doesn’t want for the information that the gunmen have to be disclosed, their fate in Russia can be easily predicted: the gunmen will either be isolated or destroyed. And the second option is to be captured in Ukraine, which enhances the chances of the gunmen to survive.

All local wars that have been taking place in the world over the last decades were international, but they were not interstate. If Russia dares to introduce troops into Ukraine, NATO will have to respond to this step. But if it happens, it will mean that Putin is ready to sacrifice millions of lives in exchange for his personal imperial ambitions.

I can’t really exclude this scenario, but the chances are really low.

- What consequences will the destruction of Boeing-777 have for the world order?

- We will have to analyze the consequences.

The defeat in the Ukraine-Russia conflict will have consequences for the Russia itself and can lead to the breakdown of the Russian Federation, which in its turn will have unpredictable consequences that can affect the whole world.

The very fact that the conflict has appeared requires the balance of forces in the world to be reviewed.

Russia will be excluded from G8. It denounced a number of agreements with the EU and the US and can be viewed as an ally to the world leading countries.

Certainly, the question about the efficiency of the UN Security Council is open, as Russia is blocking all peacemaking initiatives.

A new world order is coming into effect, and it is very different from the one established after the World War II, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the breakdown of the Soviet Union. If Putin’s attempts to arrange and strengthen BRICS will be successful, this alliance will oppose the world leading economic bloc (US, EU, and G8). I’m not sure that BRICS will turn into a world power, but now Russia will be trying to do that; all the more that it is in China’s interests as well. 

Other news section «Politics»

Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
Andrei Yahorau — Al Jazeera: “Lukashenko is irresponsible”
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf
Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
Statement of the BNP in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarus
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
Statement of the Belarusan EaP CSF National Platform on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia
The Belarusan National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum issued a statement on solidarity with the civil society of Armenia.
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
"Vilnius Consultations": Key points and recommendations on the future of EU Eastern Partnership
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
From farewell to a new Eastern policy and towards a new development
Poland and Germany were both initiators and drivers of a New Eastern policy linked to the Eastern neighborhood and Russia/Soviet Union.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: The sooner the "Union State" is denounced, the better for Belarus
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
Uladzimir Matskevich: The regime can no longer control the situation in the country
The authorities are unable to prolong the social contract with the people: there is no way out of the social crisis.
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Press release in connection with the dialogue in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Statement of the BNP in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the events of March 25-26, 2017 in Minsk and other Belarusan cities.
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
Statement by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum on mass repressions in Belarus
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
Uladzimir Matskevich: Belarus-Ukraine relations need to be re-established
"Case of Zhadan" demonstrated that Belarus does not actually have a clear policy - neither domestic nor foreign.
Belarus
Belarus's Lukashenko alleges “fifth column” plot as unrest continues
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
In Belarus, a rising fear: Will we be the next Ukraine?
The relationship between Russia and Belarus has never been an easy one.
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
Andrei Yahorau: European window of opportunity is slowly closing, relations take form of fatigue
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
Uladzimir Matskevich: Today Belarus is in a very difficult situation
But even under the circumstances the authorities have various ways out.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
Uladzimir Matskevich: Lukashenka does not disrupt Russian plans to annex Belarus
But Lukashenka is afraid for his fate and position - he needs Belarus to be sovereign to fully exercise his power.
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
Andrei Yeliseyeu: Russia is taking drastic unconstructive steps  
There should be no actual passport control for the Belarusians arriving in Russia within the framework of the existing Belarusian-Russian agreements.
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
Uladzimir Matskevich: Visa-free regime is not a political concession to the West
It is a process of normalization of Belarus-EU relations. Belarus just fulfils its international commitments.
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Andrei Yahorau: Belarusian regime is self-improving, the only threat so far is the economy crisis
Political analyst emphasizes that Belarus is the first modern authoritarianism in the European space, a phenomenon not yet studied by anyone.
Gintautas Mažeikis: The relation of political field and arena in the framework of information war

In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.

“It is our big joint work”

It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.

Shhh! Belarus Wants You to Think It’s Turning Over a New Leaf

Minsk’s muddled media clampdown could jeopardize warming of relations with the West.

Mikhail Matskevich: How to create a local agenda and make it a problem solving tool

To achieve changes, you need to be interested in them and stop pinning all hopes on the state.