Serbian President is on a two-day visit to Belarus, holding meetings with Aliaksandr Lukashenka as well as Belarusan business groups.
Tomislav Nikolic arrived in the Belarusan capital city on the night between March 11 and 12 for a two-day official visit, BelaPAN reports.
Speaking during the meeting, Lukashenka noted that Belarus and Serbia had the political will to develop their relations, cites the government's news agency BelTA the words of the Belarusan President. "Nevertheless, we have achieved certain results in the economy and trade. And today we have a political will, which is why we're not beginning but picking up where we left off."
Belarus and Serbia have a good foundation for developing their relations and a legal basis that would encourage closer ties, Lukashenka said. He stressed that cooperation between the two countries was intended to benefit their people and not directed against some third parties.
Lukashenka said that Belarus was ready to take relations with Serbia as far as Belgrade would find acceptable. He described Nikolic as a "spiritually and historically close person, a representative of a country that we had and have great love for."
Tomislav Nikolic noted, for his part, that although this was his first visit to Belarus in the capacity of Serbian president, he had repeatedly visited the country before the May 2012 election.
He said that what Lukashenka had called a "break" in bilateral relations had been temporary. Nothing can sever the ties between Serbia and Belarus, he stressed, adding that they had realized their "mistake" and would do their best to correct it. Serbia has no enemies and views Belarus as a most important friend, Nikolic said.
He expressed his gratitude to Belarus for refusing to recognize the independence of Kosovo. Serbia greatly appreciates the support of all its friends as it seeks to defend its statehood and dignity, he said.
Let us recall that in November 2012, eight European countries, including Serbia, aligned themselves with the European Union's decision to extend its sanctions against a number of Belarusan individuals and economic entities until October 31, 2013. As many as 243 Belarusan officials, including Lukashenka, are currently subject to travel bans and the same 243 persons plus 32 business entities are subject to asset freezes within the EU.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.