Aliaksandr Lukashenka took part in the funeral of Venezuelan former President Hugo Chavez. Lukashenka and Ahmadinejad standing together by the coffin of their friend could not stop the tears.
Isolated from the West, the Belarusan ruler does not have much choice when it comes to finding foreign friends and partners.
According to the Belarusan state news agency BELTA Chavez had closer friendly relations with Lukashenka than with any other foreign leader. The Belarusan authorities announced a three-days mourning in the country. All TV and radio stations were recommended not to air entertainment programmes and state flags had to be flown at half-staff starting 6 March.
That shocked many observers - when the greatest modern Belarusan writer Vasil Bykau died the authorities announced no mourning at all. Just one day mourning followed the Minsk metro bombing on 11 April 2011 that left 15 dead and hundreds wounded. Lukashenka is trying to demonstrate how highly he appreciated his personal relations with the Venezuelan leader, a stranger to most Belarusans.
Hugo Chavez used to be one of the most liberal friends of Lukashenka. At least Chavez never falsified elections in his own country. Other friends of Lukashenka, like Moammar Gaddafi and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have a much worse record.
Lukashenka likes to cooperate with other authoritarian leaders brings although that brings little financial gain to Belarus. Anti-Americanism and “resistance to the single-polar world” rhetoric are the main uniting factors here. Such cooperation serves the purpose of support to one another at the international arena and internal legitimisation.
Lukashenka’s regime often uses connections like that to show its autonomy from Russia and independence from the West. Also, these relations remain important for the internal stability of the countries. Unofficial sources claim that the special services of Belarus, Iran and Venezuela cooperate with one another and share the experience of preventing the “coloured revolutions”.
Lukashenka-Chavez Friendship
The leaders of Belarus and Venezuela made friends in 2006, when Chavez visited Minsk for the first time. Chavez suggested Lukashenka to form a “combat team”, and Lukashenka replied that they could create “a team in football, hockey or basketball”. That friendship looked very doubtful then, and the numbers confirmed it. In 2006, Belarusan export to Venezuela made $6,0 mln, and the import strived to zero.
Due to the personal friendship, the situation changed drastically. In 2012, the Belarusan export to Venezuela made $254,4 mln, while the Venezuelan export made $ 326,4 mln. Moreover, in 2010 and 2011 the import from Venezuela surpassed one billion dollars. As no other Lukashenka’s partner, Chavez put Belarus as a priority over Russia and begrudged Kremlin by selling oil to Belarus. Lukashenka promised to never to forget it.
Venezuela has become a great market for the Belarusan goods. Often their quality was so low that only a friend could buy them. The majority of the Belarusan economic projects may have to be cancelled after Chavez’ death. The new President is unlikely to sympathise the Belarusan leader so much.
Whoever becomes the new Venezuelan president - he will never become as popular as Chavez. Moreover, he will have to solve several complex internal issues and is unlikely to spend money on Lukashenka instead of his own country mates.
At first, Lukashenka did not plan to participate in his friend’s funeral personally. His close aide Victar Sheiman was supposed to go to Venezuela. However, the Belarusan leader decided to put off festive ceremonies dedicated to the International Women’s Day (an official holiday in Belarus) and flew to Caracas. Probably, he did this not only because he wanted to say goodbye to his friend, but also to try to support the Belarusan interests in Venezuela.
Other Authoritarian Friends of Lukashenka
The more negative relations Lukashenka has with Vladimir Putin or the West, the more he tries to make an impression of friendly relations with other countries. Lukashenka always liked to demonstrate his good relations with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Moammar Gaddafi, Robert Mugabe, Slobodan Milošević and even Fidel Castro.
The relations with Iran looked the brightest. Close relations with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad secured the access to the Iranian market for Belarus. Belarus is now actively selling not just traditional potassium fertilisers, but also agricultural equipment, synthetic fibre and metal products to Iran. Moreover, Belarus got an opportunity to develop an oil field in Juffair oil field while Iranians opened their “Samand” automobile factory in Belarus.
In 2006, Ahmadinejad told Lukashenka that he considered him the best friend ever. However, several years later the Iranians broke the contract for oil production with Belarusans, while the quality of “Samands” appeared so low that the Belarusans authorities decided to close the factory.
Today, the Belarusan-Iranian relations are waiting for a new start. Ineffectiveness of the economic cooperation overcame friendship.
Lukashenka also had close relations with Moammar Gaddafi. He even called him his brother in public. Like Chavez.
In 1999, Lukashenka visited Slobodan Milošević during NATO operation against Yugoslavia, in order to support him and even to discuss Yugoslavia’s joining the Union State of Belarus and Russia.
Why Lukashenka Needs Such Friends
Lukashenka has been on the EU travel ban list for many years and cannot travel to most European countries or North America. Therefore, the Belarusan authorities like to portray any minor international meeting or trip as a major international event. Lukashenka has no particular reason for hugging Mugabe, but he does it.
The second problem comes from the first one: the absence of recognition. The Belarusan regime makes a lot of fuss about its international relations pompous to send a signal to the Belarusan society that the international community recognises the Belarusan authorities and communicates with them.
Thirdly, the quality of some Belarusan products remains so low that other countries agree to buy them only on the basis of really friendly relations – they have to buy the goods not to destroy the friendship.
Nobody knows how real the friendship between the Belarusan and the Venezuelan leaders was, but Lukashenka will definitely miss Chavez. The President indeed supported Lukashenka and asked for nothing in return. Chavez, Gadaffi, Milošević - those are friends whom Lukashenka will never see again.
Every year the Belarusan ruler leader keeps loosing friends, and list of his foes continues to grow.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.