The authorities have decided to abandon their plans for such innovation.
It became known from the statement made by the Belarus Industrial Ministry. According to the press-service on the ministry, “the government had concluded after discussions that the planned measure was inexpedient and there were no plans to consider its introduction in the future”, BelaPAN quotes the statement.
Let us recall that earlier this month, the government drew up a presidential edict that would give 12 state-owned manufacturers the monopolistic right to import consumer and industrial goods between July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015.
The companies included Minsk Bearing Plant, Homel-based agricultural equipment maker Homselmash, Minsk-based machine tool manufacturer MZOR, tire maker Belshyna, Minsk Engine Plant, elevator maker Mahilyowliftmash, electronics company Intehral, refrigerator maker Atlant, television manufacturer Horizont, Minsk Tractor Works, Minsk Automobile Plant, and Kozlov Minsk Electrical Equipment Plant.
The goods in question were, among others, televisions, home appliances, bearings, engines, agricultural equipment, trucks, machine tools, elevators, and tires.
Government experts said that that the import restrictions were needed for defending the country's economic interests.
The authors of the draft edict explained that many materials and components used in the manufacture of equipment were imported at too high prices.
However, economists suggested that the measure would mostly be aimed at cutting back on imports of consumer goods.
The Belarusian government has invited the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to prepare five large state-owned companies for privatization.
Officially, the unemployment in our country is reducing – if judging by the number of registrations at the labor exchange; however, the number of jobs doesn’t increase in the economy.
Recently Belarus State Military Industrial Committee announced that in the first half of 2016 its enterprises earned a net profit of $80m, thus over-fulfilling the assigned export plans by a quarter.
Poor economic conditions in the countryside, restrictions, unfair competition, inefficiency of state-owned agricultural enterprises also contribute to this ‘success story’, writes Aliaksandr Filipau.
On 20 June Lukashenka met with vice-chair and president of the Chinese CITIC Group Corporation Wang Jiong; it seems especially important in light of Lukashenka’s planned visit to China in September.
All the conditions for everyone to be able to earn a decent salary have been enabled in Belarus, however, it is necessary to make some effort to get the money, assumes the president.
Belarus is losing currency earnings – in the 6 months of 2016 the country earned 3 billion less than in the same period in 2015. Instead of removing the causes of the flop the state relies on magic.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.