It is the seen from the results of a poll conducted in December by the Independent Institute for Social, Economic and Political Studies.
According to the Independent Institute for Social, Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS) found that 34.8 percent of Belarusians were ready to vote for Aliaksandr Lukashenka in a presidential election, quotes BelaPAN the results of the research.
According to the IISEPS, Mr. Lukashenka’s re-election rating was 29.7 in June 2012, 31.5 percent in December, 33.4 percent in March 2013, 37.3 percent in June, and 42.6 percent in September 2013.
For the first time in 2013, the share of those distrusting Mr. Lukashenka exceeded the share of those trusting him: 47.5 percent versus 37.7 percent compared with 43.2 percent versus 43.4 percent in March, 40.6 percent versus 48.9 percent in June and 36.7 percent versus 46.7 percent in September.
When asked to describe the “political strategy” of Mr. Lukashenka and his government, 36 percent said that the strategy was “to stay in power as long as possible and control the situation in the country,” 25.3 percent ticked off the answer option “to maintain public order and political stability," and 22.6 percent ticked off, “to try to gradually improve people’s living standards,” with 22.5 percent believing that the government had no strategy.
For the first time since December 2011, the share of those believing that life will improve in Belarus if Mr. Lukashenka is no longer president exceeded the share of those holding the opposite opinion: 25.2 percent versus 21.5 percent compared with 24.5 percent versus 25.9 percent in December 2011.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.