Even the possible release of political prisoners cannot be viewed as some progress in relations between Belarus and the EU.
“The release of political prisoners merely eliminates the most odious reason why Belarus-EU dialog is impossible”, - this opinion Ulad Vialichka, the chairman of the International Consortium "EuroBelarus" shared to the EuroBelarus Information Service.
According to him, recent activity of Belarusan Foreign Ministry in its efforts to demonstrate ability and readiness for more intense communication with the European structures can only be welcomed. However, the main question is whether all these efforts still lack political will to change the situation for the better: “If there is no political will for positive change in relations, all the steps will be of superficial and disguising character, aimed at smoothing over contradictions in relations rather than solving the problems and eliminating the causes of these problems. Unfortunately, for now Belarusan side worries neither about the causes nor about any other long-term interests”.
Mutual suspicion is a hindrance
- Do recent statements made by Uladzimir Makei about the possibility to overcome problems in Belarus-EU relations change something?
- For now there were no particular cases of solving the problems. There exists only attempts to move the relations from the dead center, and some small steps are being done for that, such as lift of visa ban from Uladzimir Makei, Belarusan Foreign Minister; criminal records from the participants of 2010 election campaign are being cleared, too. But these small steps only witness strong mutual suspicion and are done only to get actions in response, while all the problems remain.
Belarusan side is raising itself a price
- Which side is leading now in Belarus-EU relations then?
- I have a feeling that each side thinks that the other side is leading. But if we take a detached look on the situation, it becomes obvious that there is only one ultimate condition to unfreeze the relations, namely to release political prisoners. For some reason this condition is unfulfilled, though it is not a problem to do that.
- How good are chances that in the nearest future Belarusan authorities will finally do this step and release all the political prisoners?
- I believe that the situation is moving in this direction. However, their release will be to a certain extent connected with the forthcoming Eastern Partnership Summit. We would expect that the problem with the political prisoners resolves within the next six months, but it appears that the Belarusan side merely tries to sell this step as expensive as possible. And it’s hard to predict what “price” Belarusan side means.
We still have time till November
- What alerts me in this question is the statements made by European politicians about the assumed progress in the dialog. I hope that they are just being diplomatic in their attempt to show that the renovation of dialog after a long break is a great success per se. But this is exactly what Belarusan regime wants, when the demonstration of no progress is presented as some progress in relations. If the situation is continuing to develop in this way, Belarusan regime will only benefit from that.
It is clear that the EU expects more clear and accentuated steps from Belarus. How much time is left for that? I think that Belarus has time right up to the Summit of the EaP in November. If there is no reaction, then we can expect even stronger freezing of Belarus-EU relations.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.