Within the scope of “The European Dialog on Modernization” mechanisms of collective decision-making should be developed.
This opinion in the interview with the EuroBelarus Information Service was given by Elena Tonkacheva, human rights activist and the head of the Legal Transformation Centre “Lawtrend” on the threshold of the roundtable “EU-Belarus puzzle: rethinking European policy towards Belarus” that took place in the European Parliament on June 19. The event took place at the time of increased attention towards Justas Paleckis’s report on situation in Belarus.
“And now, when this discussion is going on, we should provide different opinions about the effectiveness of the programs launched in the EU earlier, - Elena Tonkacheva noted. – Some time has passed; and today we can already share our impressions about these programs, about the pros and cons of their implementation”.
The head of the Lawtrend believes that her main task at the roundtable is to emphasize the necessity to increase the role of the NGOs in the EU programs, and by means of these programs to increase the institutional role of the third sector”.
Today’s situation with NGOs’ participation in the “European Dialog on Modernization” can’t be named favourable. “Within the scope of the modernization dialog program mechanisms of collective decision-making should be created, - she stated. – For now, the existing plans for changing the work of the program do not help much in strengthening the role of NGOs”.
Speaking about Justas Paleckis’ report, Elena Tonkacheva believes that discussion of the assessment of the situation with human rights in Belarus has already become a thing of the past. “Today we should concentrate on recommendations that make considerable part of Paleckis’ report. And in this sense the participation of the Belarusan civil society is of high importance”, - emphasized Elena Tonkacheva.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.