As the human rights defender Ales Bialiatski serve his term in a penal colony in Belarus, his compatriots in Brussels attempt to secure his freedom and those of 10 other political prisoners.
Valiantsin Stefanovich, who heads the Belarus human rights group Viasna [meaning "Spring"] told EUobserver in Brussels that Bialiatski’s wife is no longer allowed to visit him until August. Meanwhile, their son is in self-imposed exile in Poland where he recently started his university studies.
“We have not seen Ales since August 2011,” said Stefanovich on Wednesday (10 April).
Ales’ wife in November of that year told this reporter in a Minsk cafe that she was being followed by the Belarus secret service, the KGB.
She feared for a husband who had been taken away by men in black masks and thrown into a penal colony on trumped up charges of tax evasion following a trial in a district court that was widely regarded by international observers as making a mockery of justice.
He was sentenced to 4.5 years in a maximum-security prison in the east, near the Russian border, where he spends his days sewing.
The heavy-handed rule of President Alexander Lukashenka, in power since 1994, has given little leeway to any opposition. Civil society struggles to take root and media is largely state controlled.
The repression and the mood of the country have not changed since Ales’ arrest, says Stefanovich.
“There is no freedom,” he noted.
Stefanovich says the prisoners are enduring severe restrictions and are, in some cases, denied medical treatment.
“All eleven of them are being put under increased pressure,” said a spokeswoman from the Paris-based International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH).
Those who want to leave must sign a letter of confession, an admission of guilt for charges that are politically motivated to begin with, says Stefanovich.
Some 25 political prisoners were pardoned or released in early 2011 to 2012.
But their release is conditional and some, like journalist Irena Khalip and wife of a former presidential candidate, are under close supervision and regularly harassed by unannounced police visits. All are on a so-called “preventive watch” list maintained by internal affair agencies.
“The release of all political prisoners must be a precondition to dialogue [between Belarus and the EU],” says Stefanovich.
The land-locked nation shares an open border with Russia. To the west it shares borders with EU member states Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Lukashenka famously jailed opposing presidential candidates following elections in December 2010.
The next presidential election is set for 2015, a year after the country is set to host the 2014 ice hockey World Championship.
Lukashenka is a fan of the sport.
Large red banners set up in Minsk last year were already announcing the event. Construction is also under way to expand the metro to accommodate the expected arrival of hockey fans from around the world.
Meanwhile, the European Parliament’s foreign affairs committee will put to a vote the EU strategy on Belarus in July with a final vote scheduled at a plenary session in September.
German centre-right MEP Elmar Brok, who chairs the committee, on Tuesday at a hearing on Belarus said it was “time to overcome the chains of oppression and allow the people of Belarus to have a say in their own future."
The plenary vote coincides with Lithuania’s EU presidency. Lithuania hosts the Belarus free university in Vilnius but also maintains lucrative potash and petro-chemical contracts with Minsk.
Authorities in Lithuania and Poland had both handed over to the Belarus police, the bank details that led to Bialiatski’s incarceration.
Ausra Bernotiene, who worked at the ministry of justice in Lithuania as its department director of international cooperation, at the time signed over the paperwork to Belarus. Bernotiene has since resigned from her post.
The EU imposed a number of targeted sanctions in 2011 against people inside Lukashenka’s entourage, freezing their EU-based assets and banning them from entering any member state. The list was expanded in 2012.
But Polish centre-right deputy Filip Kaczmarek says the targeted sanctions have not brought expected results.
“We must do our utmost to provide support for those in this country who think differently from the regime and who share the same values as we do in the EU,” he said.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
The Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF issued a statement in connection with the wave of searches in the editorial offices of the Belarusan media and the detention of journalists.
On September 11, the inaugural „Vilnius Consultations“ conference was organized by Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis and Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Not only does the "Union State" undermine the establishment of civilized relations with Europe, but it hinders the possibility of normal relations between Belarus and Russia.
Belarusan National Platform of the EaP CSF welcomes the dialogue process in the format of the EU-Belarus Coordination Group, the third round of which was held in Minsk on 3-4 April 2017.
The EaP CSF Steering Committee issued a statement on repressions against civil society activists and journalists in Belarus, in view of the demonstrations planned on 25 March 2017.
Belarusan President Lukashenko said on Tuesday a “fifth column” was plotting to overthrow him with the help of foreign-backed fighters, days before a planned street protest in Minsk against a new tax.
The Belarusian regime is not able to pursue a truly multi-vector policy, and the EU cannot decide what it needs in the region on the whole and from Belarus in particular.
He said Belarus would likely face economic tightening not only as a result of the coronavirus pandemic but also a Russian trade oil crisis that worsened this past winter.
In his report, philosopher Gintautas Mažeikis discusses several concepts that have been a part of the European social and philosophical thought for quite a time.
It is impossible to change life in cities just in three years (the timeline of the “Agenda 50” campaign implementation). But changing the structure of relationships in local communities is possible.