|
Despite
some minor improvements, Belarus’ September 23-28 House of Representatives
elections “ultimately fell short of OSCE commitments for democratic elections,”
OSCE observers said in a statement issued on Monday, BelaPAN said.
“The election took
place in a strictly controlled environment with a barely visible
campaign,” said the observers, who represented the OSCE Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) and the OSCE
Parliamentary Assembly.
“Voting was generally well conducted, but the
process deteriorated considerably during the vote count,” the observers
said. “Promises to ensure transparency of the vote count were not
implemented. The count was assessed as bad or very bad in 48 per cent
of polling stations visited. Where access was possible, several cases
of deliberate falsification of results were observed. OSCE monitors
were prevented or hindered from observing the vote count in 35 per cent
of cases. This compromised the transparency of this fundamental element
of the election process.”
"The clear signals to improve the election process
were not implemented and substantial improvements are required if
Belarus is to conduct genuinely democratic elections in line with our
common OSCE commitments. Unfortunately the repeated signals of good
will did not seem to have been correctly given or received.
Consequently the significant progress we hoped for in the democratic
development of Belarus did not materialize," said Anne-Marie Lizin,
vice President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly and special
coordinator of the OSCE short-term observers.
"I'm hopeful and disappointed at the same time.
Hopeful because when we came here it seemed that there was some wind of
change in the election environment; disappointed because we were unable
to see a problem solved that has been with election observation in this
country for a long time, and that is the non-transparency of the vote
count. But we hope that the improved co-operation we have experienced
during this election can be the basis for a genuine dialogue on
implementing our recommendations", said Ambassador Geert Ahrens, head
of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission.
According to the OSCE observers, positive
developments included the slightly increased access of opposition
representatives to election commissions, the decision to rebroadcast
once the five-minute candidate spots during prime time, and the
recommendation to seal ballot box slots overnight during the five-day
early voting period. Some opposition candidates noted progress in their
ability to conduct meetings in authorized locations without
interference.
“The legislative framework continues to present
obstacles for elections in line with OSCE commitments. The media
coverage of the campaign did not provide meaningful information for
voters to be able to make an informed choice. Political parties played
a minor role, and restrictions imposed by the state authorities did not
allow for a vibrant campaign with real competition,” the statement
said.
The elections were monitored by some 450 OSCE
observers from 43 countries, including more than 320 short-term
observers and 58 experts and long-term observers fielded by ODIHR, as
well as 66 parliamentarians and staff from the OSCE Parliamentary
Assembly.
|